Date: 2010-05-09 07:19 am (UTC)
and boy, was getting the details trickier than any sensible person might have hoped

Yeah, that's what I suspected. People arguing for a PRish principle tend not to go into the fine print, in that stage.

a form of SVT, but they would create bigger constituencies and multiple MPs being selected per constituency

Eeep. Okay, that is just me -- STV and multiple member system are the two I find most confusing just by themselves. *g* But I'd still find it preferable to first past the post. As the PR risk of electing some weirdo.... weeeell. At some point, if you got the weirdo voters, the guy they're electing isn't really the problem. And depriving 70% of a constituency of the representation they wanted because of the hypothetical weirdos isn't something I find helpful.

If I ran the world, I'd give you guys the German system, of which I am a fan not because it's German. (And we were very concerned about weirdos and the like when they set it up, and it worked well for that.) But it's fallen strangely out of fashion.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

tiggymalvern: (Default)
tiggymalvern

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11 121314
1516 1718192021
222324252627 28
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 06:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios