It's certainly harassment, the way these photographers follow people around absolutely everywhere. I think that's tougher to define the limits on, though. If you're going to allow any shots of celebs that aren't posed publicity photos, how do you define in a law exactly what photographers are and aren't allowed to do to get their shots? At least 'no genitalia' is legally distinct.

I'd rather live in a world where millions didn't buy People every week to read the latest scandals about 'celebs' I've never heard of, but that's how it is....