I managed to use the c-pap all night, though.
I'm a little cranky that, although he stayed up past when it was done drying, he didn't bring up the laundry. I really don't want to face the stairs right now, but that is my only source of clean clothing unless I'm willing to wake Scott.
My month to date word count is 21752. That's the highest for any month so far this year, even if I write nothing else whatsoever. Yesterday, I added about 1300 words to my Captive Audience fic and then realized I may need to make a major alteration in the setting. I'm hoping not, though. Today's writing will mostly be tweaks to the second of my Pod Together stories to try to make the rhythm of certain passages work better for the person doing the podfic.
We were surprised when we went downtown to the library yesterday afternoon-- Apparently Art Fair now includes Sunday. For as long as I can remember, Sunday was tear down and clean up, but one of the employees at the library told me that Sunday's been part of actual Art Fair for a couple of years now.
We stopped by the science and nature center to do some Ingress, and we took back the portals that someone from the other side had captured. We had planned to go into the woods to reinforce the two portals there, but we decided against it because of the risk of ticks. The other portals are all accessible from places that should be much lower risk for ticks (close cropped grass or asphalt). We'll hope no one knocks out those two portals for a while. It can be done from the street because high level bursters have a pretty extensive reach. The portals just can't be captured from there because one has to be much closer in order to place resonators and mods.
I told Scott that we should hope for the other side coming by frequently. He's close to leveling up, and recapturing a portal is worth a fair number of points.
Wonder Woman has been my favorite film so far this year, and it’s clearly resonated with a lot of romance readers (and women in general). For this edition of Stuff You Should Be Stitching, I’m focusing on Wonder Woman-themed awesomeness.
Now, you might have noticed that this column title changed from Stuff You Should Be Knitting. That’s because I’m going to try and focus more on cross stitch, needlepoint, sewing, and crochet as well. I’ll try to feature as many free patterns as possible too.
Stitchy Bitches unite!
First up, look at this beauty:
I literally gasped when I saw this. I have a lot of knitting planned–like 6 shawls by Christmas. I just bought yarn for a Find Your Fade. I still really, really need to make this for me.
Can you imagine wrapping up in this in the office, fighting professional injustice?
Also free is the Wonder Woman sweater by Natalie Bursztyn.
This is a seamed sweater, with a raglan sleeve and requires knowledge of colorwork.
If these projects are too large, there are smaller ones available too!
Lastly for knitters, we have Wonder Woman Fingerless Gloves by Ducky Dame. This pattern is available for $4 on Etsy and could be a great stash-buster.
There are a TON of awesome Wonder Woman cross stitch patterns out there–don’t believe me? Just Google. Here are a few of my favorites.
This pattern by Hall Stitch is available on Esty for $3.75 and I love how it features just the shadow of Wonder Woman, her logo blazing through in white. It requires five floss colors and is available as a PDF download.
If you’re looking for a smaller project, there’s always this Wonder Woman logo available on Etsy for $2.75. It’s a digital file and requires five colors of floss.
If you are happiest hooking, then you’ll be delighted by some of these awesome Wonder Woman crochet patterns.
My personal favorite is this gorgeous throw. I love how bold the colors are, and the black outline really makes the image pop. It’s designed by Nicole Pellegrino and is available for $8. The difficulty level is listed as easy, so it could be a fun project for beginners.
Fans of arugami (crocheting small stuffed dolls or animals) should check out this free pattern. This adorable Wonder Woman doll would be great to give as a gift to an adult or child, or just to keep on your desk.
Another amazing free pattern is this Wonder Woman headband with Diana’s long raven locks. Look at how adorable it is! The designer lists it as a beginner pattern too! I may have just died from the cute!
Last but not least is a sewing pattern for this Wonder Woman inspired apron. It’s available for $8 on Etsy and comes as a PDF download. I can’t sew or cook, but I have serious apron envy.
I’m going to a new Little Yarn Store this week and I may just have to get some yarn for that first shawl pattern.
I know so many of you are knitters, stitchers, hookers, and crafty crafters, so I want to make sure you know about the SBTB Ravelry Group! Come join us!
Did Wonder Woman inspire your crafting? What are you stitching?
This is the book that I was most excited to get at RT. When people saw that it was out in the wild, the most inhuman noises were made, and it was worth all of those noises.
ALL OF THEM.
So much angst. So much pathos. EVERYTHING HAPPENS SO MUCH.
Nicholas and Livvy are the scions of a grocery store partnership dynasty, started by their grandfathers after World War II. Ten years before the book began, Nicholas’ mother and Livvy’s father died in car accident, and Nicholas’ father bought Livvy’s mother’s share of the company for pennies on the dollar, leading to a schism the likes of which the grocery world had never seen. Livvy and Nicholas were a very happy couple until that point. Then Nicholas dumped her, Livvy left town, and in the intervening ten years, Livvy would text Nick to come to her on her birthday, where they would bang in the ancient and honorable tradition of “only one night, no one needs to know.”
Everyone has this idea that there is no way this plan could go wrong for them, but then it always does.
But her last birthday, Livvy didn’t summon Nick, and Nick was like, “Welp, I’m gonna wash the girl right out of my hair” but then her mother has a medical crisis. Livvy comes back to town and finally, it’s time to deal with all the festering crap. Will Nick and Livvy figure their shit out? Or even make a decision that they even could figure their shit out?
What I loved about this story is that here were two families who let themselves be defined by one event…but they were different events. For Nick’s family, and specifically his father, it was the car accident. For Livvy’s family, it was the fact that Nick’s father cheated her mother out of their share of the company. Everything all of these people have done in the intervening ten years all lead back to those two moments in time.
Rai has described this as, “Romeo and Juliet without all the sexism crap and with an HEA” and….kind of? I mean, feuding families, yes, but it’s missing a bunch of the other elements that make up R&J. Children of feuding families falling in love is not exactly a trope that Shakespeare made up, and I know I’m being a bit snobby right here.
I very much liked how Rai worked in the history of the Japanese Internment Camps during WWII. Livvy’s grandfather was a child of Japanese immigrants, and when they were sentenced to a camp, they gave most of their belongings and assets to Nick’s family. Luckily, Nick’s family held them in trust for Livvy’s family and didn’t steal them (that was a thing that happened), and the two families were inseparable…until they were separated by a series of TERRIBLE CHOICES.
There’s a lovely through line about tattoos and the art people put on their bodies and the reasons for the art they choose. We’ve had a post or two about the book-related tattoos some of our delightful Bitchery have, and I know how deeply personal tattoos are for people, and that’s no less true here.
Often in books (not romance, I mean books in general) side characters can feel under-developed. They just sort of exist to nudge the plot along while the main characters get all the character development. One of things Rai has taken the time to do is make sure she knows what the motivations are for all of the supporting characters. They all have their own inner lives. We don’t spend a lot of time dealing with the needs and wants of Livvy’s sister-in-law (as an example), but I believe that Rai knows what they are, and that made her breathe on the page. Nick’s sister, Livvy’s mother, Nick’s father… all of these people are full characters in their own right.
In certain moods, I love me some angst, and this had SO MUCH ANGST. SO MUCH. Nick and Livvy were SO DAMAGED by the actions of their parents. Because families that have a fuck ton of money have the ability to use that money to bully younger generations, they both felt like they could not simply walk away from the mess together. (Please note: Livvy’s family no longer has their fuck ton of money, and Livvy is the one who walks away.) It’s so complicated, and so messy. I highly suggest reading this with a big glass of wine or a pint of ice cream (or both, don’t let me limit your experience).
This RITA® Reader Challenge 2017 review was written by ReneeG. This story was nominated for the RITA® in the Long Historical category.
USA Today bestselling author Laura Lee Guhrke is back with the latest in her dazzling An American Heiress in London series, in which a reformed rogue finds all his honorable resolutions tested by the only woman who ever broke his heart…
After spending his youth as one of the wildest rakes in the ton, Lord Denys Somerton has devoted the past six years to putting his past behind him. He is determined to fulfill his duties, find a suitable wife, and start a family, but that plan changes when Lola Valentine—the red-haired temptress from his past—returns to London, sparking the same irresistible desires that almost ruined his life once before.
Lola is a woman with no romantic illusions. She knew love would never be enough for a British lord and an American girl from the wrong side of the tracks. For Denys’s sake, she walked away from him and the glittering life he offered. But when an unexpected inheritance brings her back to London, Lola discovers the passion between them is as hot as ever. Can they vanquish it, or will it burn out of control again and destroy them both?
Here is ReneeG's review:
No Mistress of Mine is the fourth book in the An American Heiress in London series and is second-chance-at-love catnip with competence porn sprinkles on top. It isn’t necessary to read the other books in the series in order to follow and enjoy this one. And, unusually, this book takes place in 1892 – shout-out to late Victorian industry!
Our stars, Denys (a British lord) and Lola (an American cancan/music hall star) have quite the past. They met in Paris when Denys was a young and irresponsible lordling and Lola was dancing said cancan. Lola moved to London with Denys, where he set her up in a little house in St. John’s Wood after she gave in to his mistress request. He mortgaged his property to finance her star turn in a play that quickly closed due to her poor acting abilities, so Lola ran away, back to Paris and dancing, where Denys followed her and proposed. Lola broke Denys’ heart when she turned him down, implying she was choosing an American investor as her next conquest and returning to America with him. Whew, that’s the backstory.
Our story opens with Lola’s American investor dying suddenly and leaving her his half ownership interest in a London theatre along with a nice chunk of change; the other half of the theatre is owned by Denys’ dad, Lord Conyers. After his wild, passionate, and expensive (failed theatre runs are not cheap) fling with Lola, and subsequent return from Paris after the failed proposal, Denys settled down and took over the family’s business concerns, including the theatre, and discovered he enjoys working for a living. Of course, Denys is a fabulous businessman and has done a tremendous job becoming wealthy and boring, but now he is toying with the idea of settling down with a childhood friend to start producing the next heir. But Lola’s back in town and she has a plan to both fulfill her dream of becoming a serious actress and to ditch the music hall singer/dancer persona once and for all – and she needs Denys’ help to do it.
What I enjoyed the most about the book was the competence porn and the “using of the words.” First, Lola had studied very hard to become a dramatic actress while performing in her own one-woman show in New York (which she had devised and updated, according to the limits placed upon her by her backers). It seemed realistic, based solely on my love of Hollywood and Broadway musicals, that Lola’s backers would want her to keep doing the type of show that was making them money (the old “wink and jiggle, song and dance” act), regardless of Lola’s desire for Shakespeare. It took the death of her “American protector” to free her to pursue her dream in London.
While realizing that the only way she would have a chance at a serious dramatic role involves using her inherited half of the theatre, Lola is also very aware that she will cause Denys pain when she comes back into his life. She apologizes for what happened in the past and spends much time trying to explain about her past (and thinking naked thoughts about Denys). Denys, practicing advanced therapeutic techniques not often seen in Late Victorian London, gradually hears her and comes to understand why she acted the way she did (while also thinking naked thoughts about Lola). Witty banter and genuine communication happen. It doesn’t occur overnight, but over time harsh feelings are softened. Real naked-times happen, not as a weapon from the past but as a gift for the present. The pacing of this was well done – Lola didn’t blurt out what happened to her all at once, but placed pieces of herself before Denys to help him understand her better; they didn’t hop into bed for revenge or old-time memories but because they had hot pants for each other now.
The part which let me down was the ending. Spoilers ahoy!
After Lola says that society will always see her as trash, Denys sets up a Surprise! proposal to show Lola that he knows best, and uses his friends and their American wives to persuade Lola to stay.
This was a step too far for me. None of the wives had met Lola personally, but they all agree to stand with her against the ton. But let’s take a moment and think about this – wouldn’t you want to meet the woman who was the heartbreaking ex-cancan-dancer-actress-mistress of your husband’s friend and make up your own mind? Wouldn’t that seem rather necessary, especially if you were a just-married American heiress being called upon to use your new social clout to protect said heartbreaker from the slings and arrows of London Society? Do these wives have any ability to say “nope, not gonna ‘til we do tea” to their husbands?
In Romancelandia, an ex-cancan-dancer-actress-mistress (especially if she reforms into a serious actress who does Shakespeare) can grab a happy ending with a lord and get to be part of the ton by jumping through some hoops to make herself respectable. And when you have to reform a shady lady so she is fit for said society, you sometimes have to stretch the story to make it fit that HEA. It just seems a bit much to take away poor Lola’s strength and purpose to make that stretch.
Because the ending seemed so rushed and pulled out of the ether, especially after all the work establishing Lola as a strong, successful woman and the effort Lola and Denys put into their relationship, I had to lower my initial grade. Still, No Mistress of Mine was a mostly enjoyable story, despite how personally disappointing the ending was.
I’d like to thank everyone at SBTB for the opportunity to write these reviews. It is great fun to contribute to a site I love so much!
No Mistress of Mine by Laura Lee Guhrke received a B- in a previous RITA Reader Challenge Review.
by Christopher Nolan
This is a movie that starts tense, stays tense, and ends… still pretty tense. It’s also a masterclass in film structure, and I would put it up there with Hell or High Water as one of the best constructed movies of the modern age.
It also had one of the most effective teaser trailers I’ve ever seen.
Dunkirk tells the story of the Miracle at Dunkirk, a week at the end of May and beginning of June, 1940 where the bulk of the British Expeditionary Forces and the remaining French army were surrounded by the German army on all sides. A superhuman effort to get as many of the 400,000 troops out of France was more successful than expected, due to the use of the Little Ships of Dunkirk: civilian fishing boats, ferries, pleasure yachts, and lifeboats that were shallow enough to come up to the beaches and gather up as many people as they could. When Churchill put Operation Dynamo, the evacuation plan, in motion, he expected to evacuate around 35,000 troops. In the end, the number was over 338,000.
It’s one of those turning points in history: if the BEF had been crushed by the German army in that week, that probably would have been it for the Allied forces. Stuff You Missed in History Class did an excellent two part episode covering the events leading up to the Dunkirk evacuation, and the evacuation itself, and I highly recommend it.
Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight Trilogy, Inception, Interstellar) got the idea for this movie over 20 years ago, but realized that he wasn’t a good enough filmmaker yet to make the movie he had in his head, so he shelved it, and worked on movies with big scopes and big budgets and played around with narrative and made himself into the filmmaker that could make this movie the way he wanted to.
The movie is structured around three POVs: land, sea, and air. On land, he tells the story of the men on the beach – it takes about a week in their time. On sea, the story is one of the little ships, and we’re with them for one day. In the air, there’s three Spitfires providing air support to the operation, and we’re with them for an hour. The narratives cut back and forth between POVs, until they overlap and eventually end with all the narratives ending at the same place.
It’s basically the movie version of the Golden Ratio. I can’t stress enough how much I liked how well put together each storyline was and how well they wove together. Nolan has talked about how he used a mathematical structure to put things together, and what this does is it makes the entire film extremely atmospheric and claustrophobic.
In the land section (it’s referred to as The Mole, because of the breakwater that was used as a dock, since most of the harbor at Dunkirk was destroyed), most of the action is experienced through the eyes of a young soldier, Tommy (FIonn Whitehead, aka Not Harry Styles), as he makes it through the town of Dunkirk to the beach, and onto various ships as he tries to get home. He hooks up with Alex (Harry Styles) and some other people, while the officers (Kenneth Branagh and James D’arcy) manage the evacuation.
On the sea, Mark Rylance plays a man who owns a pleasure yacht, and when the call goes out that the Navy is activating the civilian fleet go to Dunkirk and help, he chooses to pilot his own ship, instead of letting the Navy commandeer her (in general, most of the Little Ships were piloted by the Navy). With him is his son and another kid from their town, and they pick up Cillian Murphy from a wreck along the way. Cillian Murphy is only credited as “shivering soldier” and is completely traumatized by his experiences.
In the air, Tom Hardy flies a Spitfire and shoots down German planes. We get to see his face once, and most of his scenes are just him, in his cockpit.
There are a bunch of things that make this movie so effective. One is that the Germans are mostly a completely unseen threat. You never see them, except in planes. You don’t know where they are or where they’re coming from. The movie starts almost in media res: all Nolan needs you to know is that the bulk of the British army is on this beach, and there’s no way out but across the Channel. You don’t need to know anyone’s backstory, or motivation, except for what is immediately important: get off the beach, get as many people on the boat as possible, shoot down those planes.
Another thing is the music. Hans Zimmer did the score, and his partnerships with Nolan has been REALLY good. I like Zimmer’s music a lot, but he has a tendency toward sameness, except when a director can really get him to focus. Most of the score involves a low drone in the background, reminiscent of the sounds of a diving plane, or an air raid siren. It adds to sense of dread and urgency. (I like using Zimmer’s music as a writing sound track. I’m wondering how well this will work added to my “writing” playlist.)
My main criticism is that I wish that either Fionn Whitehead or Harry Styles had blonde hair. They looked a LOT alike so it was hard to keep them straight. That’s kind of the point- the swirling mass of humanity was supposed to be faceless, but I spent a lot of time going “Is that… which kid is that?”
Also, yes, it’s a dude heavy movie – there were women involved at Dunkirk, mostly as nurses on the ships (the heroine in The Secrets of Nanreath Hall was a Dunkirk nurse), and they are seen, but not really involved in the main thrust of the narrative. Honestly, I’m okay with this particular facet. Others might feel differently.
It’s also an exclusively white movie, and there were four companies from the Indian Army Service Corps at Dunkirk. (I could not find quickly any concrete information on other soldiers of color in the BEF, other than a forum that said “Well, there wasn’t really a color bar for the British army” so if anyone has more solid sources, please do post them.) (Edited to add: Slate has a good article on accuracy in the movie, and they do address the Indian Army Service Corps issue – that it would have been good to see them, even though yeah, it would have been less than a thousand among hundreds of thousands. And there were French soldiers of North African ancestry who were also part of the evacuation.)
What I liked best was what I can learn about storytelling: what are different ways to tell a story that makes the point the creator wants? Take risks! Trust your audience! And if you have an idea for an art, but you think you might not be ready to make it yet so it works in the way you want it to, it’s okay to shelve it and develop your skills until you’re the creator you need to be for this piece of art to match your vision.
I am not gonna lie. I cried when those Little Ships came across the horizon. In the Imperial War Museum in London, the Tamzine, the littlest of the Little Ships, stands next to a Spitfire and other vehicles of war. And she’s just as important. She had a job to do, and she did it.
For 100 Days
For 100 Days by Lara Adrian is 99c! This is a contemporary erotic romance and the first in a trilogy, so there MAY be some cliffhanger action going on, but I didn’t see anything about that in any reviews. Readers also recommend this book for fans of alpha heroes, so if that isn’t you bag, you may want to reconsider!
Struggling artist Avery Ross is barely scraping by. Bartending at a trendy New York City restaurant for an overbearing boss and two weeks away from losing her apartment to a condo developer, she’s desperate for a break. So when she’s offered a temporary housesitting job, she takes it.
Living at one of the poshest addresses in Manhattan is like entering a new world–one that catapults her into the orbit of billionaire Dominic Baine, the darkly handsome, arrogantly alpha resident of the building’s penthouse. What begins as a powerful attraction soon explodes into a white-hot passion neither can deny.
Yet as scorching as their need for each other is, Avery doesn’t expect Nick’s interest in her to last. Nor does she dare to dream that the desire she feels for this scarred, emotionally remote man could deepen into something real. For Avery has secrets of her own–and a past that could destroy her . . . and shatter everything she and Nick share.
FOR 100 DAYS is the first novel in a passionate new contemporary romance trilogy from New York Times and #1 international bestselling author Lara Adrian.
Broken Resolutions by Olivia Dade is $1.99! Readers thought the book was missing a lot of the romance, while others loved the pairing of a shy librarian and a reclusive author. However, readers also say it’s a series that gets better and better. Have you read this one?
LOVE BETWEEN THE LINES
Romance has never had a happy ending for librarian Penny Callahan, who could write the book on cheating, heartbreaking liars. So she’s made a resolution: no men for the next twelve months. If she can just get through the library’s New Year’s Eve singles night, she can return home to her pajamas and a good book. But when she finds herself checking out a hot hunk with an irresistible smile, an evening in the stacks becomes a lot more tempting…
Reclusive author Jack Williamson never should have trusted his mother. Even though he’s trying to avoid being recognized, she guilts him into attending a dating meet-and-greet—where an adorable librarian makes him question his lonely lifestyle. Is this just a fleeting, flirty scene? Or could love be the next chapter for them both?
Dangerous in Diamonds
Dangerous in Diamonds by Madeline Hunter is $1.99! This is the fourth book in the Rarest Blooms series, but it can be read as a standalone. Readers loved the “bad boy” duke hero, but some say there’s a big reveal or twist at the end that caught them off guard. It has a 3.9-star rating on Goodreads.
There is only one man who can shake Daphne’s composure.
And there is only one woman who can resist Castleford’s outrageous brand of seduction.
The Duke of Castleford has been so bad for so long that scandal can’t be bothered to rise up around him anymore. To alleviate the boredom of his privileged life, he occupies himself with drinking and whoring, not to mention the occasional duel. When something piques his interest, however, he has been known to emerge from his ennui and employ his considerable mental faculties to finding answers to the questions that fascinate him.
When Daphne Joyes rejects this notorious hedonist’s seduction, she assumes that he will forget about her and continue on his path to hell. Instead her beauty, grace and formidable composure captivate him, and she becomes one of those fascinations to him. That he intends to have her, and soon, is actually the least of the dangers that his pursuit of her presents. More troublesome is his interest in her past and her history, and the way he keeps poking his nose into the secrets behind the distant relative’s bequest that gave him ownership of the property where she lives.
Rope ‘Em by Delphine Dryden is 99c! This is an erotic romance with cowboys! It’s also the second in the Giddyup series and the first book is also on sale! There is a trigger warning for this book for attempted sexual assault. However, readers loved the chemistry between the hero and heroine, as well as the BDSM elements.
Returning home to help out with his brother’s dude ranch is cool with Ethan. After all, he’s as comfortable in the saddle as he is roping a calf. But what’s really jangling his spurs is a chance to indulge his kink in the ranch’s monthly Giddyup event. Did someone say suspension bondage? Yee-Haw!
When Victoria realizes her family’s number one goal in sending her to college is to get her hitched to a husband, she drops out one semester shy of graduation. But paying her own way turns out to be the hardest lesson of all. Thankfully she’s found her way to the Hilltop Ranch. A place to get away and refocus. And get herself all tied up. . .
Sure, Ethan’s pretty handy with that length of rope. But it turns out the expensive design school wasn’t a total waste for Victoria. Bringing an “academic” approach to their play—and Ethan’s hobby—is opening up new possibilities. Like maybe the chemistry between them is something more than a game. . .
Always a Bridesmaid
This RITA® Reader Challenge 2017 review was written by Jillian Boyd. This story was nominated for the RITA® in the Long Contemporary category.
She’s all heart. He’s all business.
Parvati Jai knows better than to pin any romantic hopes on Max Dewitt. She may have had a crush on her best friend’s older brother since she figured out what boys were good for, but she’s looking for Mister Forever – not a workaholic entrepreneur with a romantic attention span that tops out at two weeks. Yet with her business failing, her newly-engaged best friend vanishing into a love bubble, and even her teenage niece announcing she’s getting married, Max becomes the one person she can rely on – and the idea of a little fling with him becomes even more tempting.
Max knows his little sister’s best friend is off-limits…until Parvati confesses she once had a crush on him and he can’t help seeing her in a new – and very intriguing – light. He’s never been good at letting people past his charming facade, but something about Parvati makes him want to let down his defenses.
But even if he lets himself fall for her, how can he convince a woman who knows all about his love-’em-and-leave-’em ways that he finally wants forever?
Here is Jillian Boyd's review:
Even though Always a Bridesmaid is a spin-off from Lizzie Shane’s Reality Romance series, this one works perfectly fine if you haven’t read that series. This book gives you just the right amount of context. Our heroine, Parvati Jai – lifelong besties with Sidney Dewitt, the protagonist from Planning on Prince Charming – is the owner of a little indie coffee house in Eden, California. She’s single, which makes her the odd one out among her sisters and cause for a lot of gentle familial concern.
But the being single thing is the least of Parv’s worries – her business is failing, and fast, and she’s run out of ideas to keep the coffee house going. In addition to that, her 18-year-old niece announces her engagement at Parv’s parents’ wedding anniversary party, and her bff Sidney is caught up in her own wedding planning business (not to mention the reality show she hosts, where she’s responsible for planning fairytale weddings for deserving brides). For Parv, the feeling of loneliness is an ever-creeping menace.
There’s one bright spot in her life though – Sidney’s brother, Max. Loyal customer at her coffee shop, in her life since she was six years old, the object of a very long-standing crush.
Max Dewitt was tall and muscular enough that he should have looked like a wrestler in a monkey suit, but instead he looked like James Bond – a sexy, super ripped James Bond with perfectly styled dark brown hair and steely grey eyes that somehow managed to be warm when he smiled at her. Which he did now, revealing perfectly straight, perfectly white teeth. And the dimple… really, the dimple was just unfair. Sex appeal overkill.
It’s… not hard to see why, is it?
A big theme in the book, apart from friends-to-lovers (and if this is your catnip, delve right in) is the expectations familial legacies bring with them. Parvati’s folks have been together since they were both nineteen. Her father is a retired and highly respected pharmaceutical researcher – who used to work for Max and Sidney’s mother. Her mother was a developmental psychologist and educational adviser to the governor of California, and has a best-selling book and a career as a motivational speaker.
Add to that four fiercely intelligent career women as older sisters, all of them married and with kids, all of them with CV’s which are… well, impressive does not begin to cover it. Max and Sidney, meanwhile, are the children of two steely-eyed career people. As mentioned earlier, their mother owned a pharmaceutical company, and their father is a powerful business mogul who has based himself mostly in Switzerland. There are some pretty messed-up dynamics between the Dewitts and their kids, who both own their own businesses but continue to operate under the shadow of their own upbringing.
It’s a lot to live up to, and Parv spends a lot of the book feeling like she’s failed at life because she isn’t more like her sisters and parents. Which, at points, does make you feel like you want to take her aside and tell her everything will be fine, love, you walk your own path and other stuff to that tune. But Parv feels so relatable – whether you’re at a cross-roads with your working life, or you’re a bit deflated because everyone around you seems to be settling down. Sure, everything’s drawn in broad strokes, but there will be moments where you go… “ah, yes, it me, just a little bit.”
“And I never once felt like I could relax. Five years of stress, Max. The only place I felt like myself was in my stainless steel palace of a kitchen. Which was too big, really, for a coffee house, but I indulged because it was the only place I could breathe.”
Max – the owner of a security agency – can get annoyingly protective. There’s a lot of mention of Parv being “off limits,” to the point where it’ll make you roll your eyes. There are a few bits of plot that get brushed over and not given a satisfying ending. And the tension between Parvati and Sidney goes on for far too long. But this is, by and large, a good book which reads at a zippy pace. It made me want to delve into the series it’s been spun off from – which revolves around a The Bachelor-style reality show called Marrying Mr. Perfect – and makes me want to read the books in this new series as well. Especially the next book, tackling the relationship between Max’s tech guru Candy and bodyguard Pretty Boy (oh my Christ, Candy is proper heart-eyes material).
If you’ve been feeling a bit low, Always a Bridesmaid does the business as a pick-me-up read and does it very well. Fair warning though – it will make you want cake. Like, a lot.
Always a Bridesmaid by Lizzie Shane received a B- in a previous RITA Reader Challenge Review.
Welcome back to Stuff We Like, a regular column where we shop and share items we think you’ll love.
By reader request, I’m building a Stuff We Like series on one-bag packing and tools to help you organize and travel light. My goal is to show how I travel with one bag, and since my next trip is to RWA in Florida, I have plenty of examples to share.
So far, here’s what we’ve got:
- The Calm Traveler Packing List Template for Business Travel – many of you emailed to say how useful it was, so thank you!
- I have also written about the tiny bag I carry with me all the time, and the tech essentials inside it.
- By request, I shared the Calm Traveler Packing List Template for Family Travel, which many of you have told me was very helpful as well. Yay for summer family travel!
- The Calm Traveler Guide to Pack Light and Travel Fast: Toiletries, wherein I shared what I keep in my toiletry bag for travel, even the slightly embarrassing stuff.
Today? Packing everything else! We’re going to talk about packing cubes and luggage options for quicker, lower-stress travel.
There are three ways I’ve tried packing clothing and shoes for trips, both by car for a weekend or by plane for nearly a month.
- Rolling clothes into tubes and packing them into a suitcase or bag
- Rolling clothes into tubes then putting them inside an airtight compression bag, which goes in my suitcase
- Rolling clothes into tubes then putting them inside a packing cube, which goes in my suitcase
Obviously, I roll up my clothes. This isn’t earth shattering but it makes it a lot easier for me to see what I have, and keeps most of my clothing low on wrinkles.
To be completely honest, I love compression bags. I love how they squish everything down to a smaller size, and I can fit a lot into my bag when I use them. But there’s a serious flaw: when they spring a leak, and they do, they’re useless.
Compression bags work by loading up all your clothing items into a giant zip-top bag with a one-way air valve, usually at the bottom. You close the bag, then roll up the bag, forcing the air out of the valve, leaving your clothes extremely squished and flat.
It’s like the clothing version of a vacuum sealer removing air from around food you’re going to store in the freezer for awhile.
Note: that’s not me. I can’t wear a watch that big.
There are a few kinds of travel compression bags I’ve used, including some from Travelon ($20) and from Eagle Creek ($30). I loved them – especially when packing bulky things for colder weather. I could squish down anything and everything and fit more in my bag.
But like I said, leaks end the joy real fast, and they’re difficult if not impossible for me to effectively repair, especially in a hotel. Just about all the bags I’ve purchased eventually started to leak.
So now I use packing cubes, and while they don’t squish as much as compression bags, I can pack a lot in them, and everything is very organized.
Packing cubes come in a bunch of different sizes, but for the most part, they’re nylon bags, often square (hence “cube”) with a zipper closure. There are big ones for sweaters and jeans, and small ones for undergarments or socks.
I have two sets from two different places. eBags’ packing cubes have been all over the world with me.
The eBags six piece packing cube set is currently about $50, though the full price is nearer to $75 (eBags frequently has sales, however, so keep checking back if there isn’t a discount code at present).
I can usually fit my clothing in the medium and small sized ones, and then socks, undergarments and extras go in one of the long narrow rectangles. The tops are a mesh fabric so you can press a lot of air out, but they don’t stay compressed, obviously.
Tip: the easiest way to load a packing cube I’ve found is to place large items in first, rolled up if possible. When it’s about 3/4 filled, zip the top closed on two out of the three sides, and turn the cube so it’s like a bag with the unzipped part at the top. I can usually fit a few more items in that way before I close it.
eBags also makes a new ultra-light packing cube, which looks very cool, but the thing with cubes like these? They last for such a long time in such good condition I don’t need to replace mine (though there are some tempting options, including these from Eagle Creek which combine packing cubes AND compression!).
Plus, Amazon has a bunch of packing cube choices, too – including some from their own Amazon Basics line for $16-$25.
And I just found this, should you be looking to equip yourself or need a gift for someone who is traveling: there’s an eBag value pack that includes packing cubes, shoe sleeves, and the eBags toiletery kit (which I use and love) for $70-80 (depending on sales).
The other packing cubes I have are from Tom Bihn, and I’m going to cover the cubes and the Bihn luggage I use in a moment. (I have to apologize in advance if this is your introduction to the Bihn items, as they can be very addictive.)
Packing cubes help you stay organized once you arrive, too. I tend to group like items together, and for things like workout clothing or garments I don’t need to hang in the closet, I can drop the unzipped cube into the dresser drawer at a hotel. It’s pretty handy.
So, on to the next part, which is where you put the packing cubes once they’re carrying your excellent, cultivated wardrobe for your trip:
There are so many suitcase options out there, and they change almost as fast as color trends do. Backpacks in different shapes, roller bags with two wheels – or ultralight hard shell roller bags with four wheels! I saw a bunch of those when I traveled recently. You have a lot of choices.
I’m not going to cover all of them, but I am going to show what bags we use most often, and why.
For one bag travel, I’m not a fan of roller bags. Roller bags can be great great if you have mobility challenges, or if wearing a backpack isn’t an option for you – above all, do what works best and easiest (and safest!) for you.
The problem with roller bags is that the wheels and the handle do two things: they take up a lot of space, and they make the shape of the bag itself rigid and fixed. With overhead spaces (and airplanes as well) getting smaller and smaller, and with bag checking fees getting higher and higher, I want to know that the bag I’m carrying won’t need to be gate checked, or checked into the cargo bay for me to claim at the baggage area at my destination.
Backpack style bags work very well for me, especially because there is very little space used by the bag itself. No wheels, no handle, no structure. It’s soft sided and very handy.
I do use a roller style bag (from Costco! It’s indestructible, that thing) when I have to carry extra stuff with me, like bulky swag or larger items like notebooks and paperback books to give away at RT. But my goal with 90% of my travel is to use my backpack-style bag.
There are two we love (and I’ll show a few other options, too):
My husband usually uses this one and he loves it. We recently traveled for a week with stops in Zurich, Greece, and France, and fit clothing and toiletries, plus two changes of shoes for two adults for 8 days in this bag. You can fit a lot in this bag (which does make it heavy at times, I won’t lie).
This bag opens like a suitcase and has a large main compartment and a bunch of pockets. He’s so familiar with using it that if he packs it for the two of us, or for us plus the kids, we have assigned areas for different items so everyone knows where key things are like charging cables (pocket at the top) or keys (side zipper). When we traveled to Australia in 2014, which was when I became addicted to one-bag travel, he carried this for the three of them.
The benefit to a soft sided backpack style like this one: it fits almost anywhere, including itty bitty overheads (if it’s not stuffed silly). We’ve traveled on a few very restrictive budget airlines, like EasyJet and the like, and the bag has always fit in the overhead with no problems. And while these are not backpacks designed to be worn constantly for hours on end, like the ones you’d wear for trail hiking, they are comfortable enough and manageable for travel to and from the airplane and airport.
Another benefit: there have been a few times I’ve traveled and put my backpack bag under the seat in front of me when there was no overhead space, and it fit just fine. I also have very short legs and my feet never touch the floor on any airplane seat or chair I sit in, so having the bag under me meant I could rest my feet on it, and I was pretty comfortable for once.
There are other soft-sided one-bag options that have cult followings online, such as the Red Oxx Air Boss and Mini Boss ($265 and $245 respectively). Doug Dyment, the writer and host of OneBag.com, a site devoted to one-bag travel tips, helped design the Air Boss, and recommends it. Wirecutter recommended the Tortuga Outbreaker ($249), which is designed to be comfortable while wearing the bag for extended periods. And if you search “one bag travel” there are so many recommendations and suggestions. You could go down a rabbit hole for weeks researching everything (ASK ME HOW I KNOW THIS).
I’m highlighting a good number of options because the one I ultimately went with is on the more expensive side – I ended up haunting eBay for weeks until I won an auction for the bag I wanted in my price range. This meant I couldn’t be picky about the color, but I wasn’t too bothered about that.
Tom Bihn is a Seattle-based company that makes luggage and bags out of superbly strong materials, and it has a cult following much like… just about anything on the internet.
I like the Aeronaut (45, or original recipe – there’s a new, smaller one, the Aeronaut 30) over the eBags one for a couple of reasons. One, I’m pretty short, and the size and shape of the Aeronaut makes it easier for me to manage.
Two, the backpack straps tuck inside the bag so it can be carried like a suitcase or worn on my back:
And three, it has one large main compartment, two smaller ones on the side, and a zipper pocket on one short side as well. I’ve gotten very used to packing it. This is the bag I took with me for three-plus weeks all over Australia, and I’ve carried it almost everywhere since then.
I also have a few packing cubes designed specifically for the Aeronaut that fit the two side pockets that work great for shoes. With the Aeronaut, I can carry clothing for a week-long conference or vacation and have room left over for gifts I might pick up. At RWA, this is likely what I’ll be carrying, and it’ll hold my clothing, workout gear, toiletries, swag, and podcast recording equipment, too.
If you enjoyed this series, you can get more from the Organization Academy newsletter, where I share early content, exclusive tips, plus news on the development of the course series I’m building about using Google Calendar (and other tools!) to make your life easier:
With this series, I’ve covered packing list organization, toiletries, and luggage based on the research I’ve done for my own one-bag travel quest. What do you use for your own travel? Is there a topic I’ve missed that you’d like me to elaborate on?
by Lawrence Kasdan
Sarah: For all the fond memories I have of this movie, they’re collectively rather vague. I clearly remember two scenes: the one with the scarf and the sword, and the one where she’s got a tin foil hat on. So this will be an interesting rewatch to see if my fond romantic memories of what probably amounts of 2 minutes of screen time match the full feature-length film however many years later.
Carrie: I have to confess that I have never had any desire to watch this movie.
Elyse: I have sooo many childhood memories about this movie. It will be interesting to see if it holds up. Back when this movie came out the dreamiest dudes were: Kevin Costner, Patrick Swayze and Mel Gibson. This movie featured at many sleepovers. RIP Patrick. Costner still holds up. Fuck you, Mel.
RHG: I have not seen this movie since the early 90s, and boy, do those titles and the style take me back. I feel like I’m not experiencing this correctly by watching it on streaming and not VHS.
Carrie: Also I miss Whitney.
Sarah: She does imperious very well. And she’s surrounded by chaos. Have fun with that, Frank.
Carrie: I see that someone watched some Steve McQueen to prep for this. And some Michael Keaton.
Sarah: TWENTY FIVE.
I just looked it up. THIS MOVIE IS TWENTY FIVE YEARS OLD. WOW.
Carrie: Hey, according to IMBD, Costner said he based his performance on McQueen (you, sir, are no McQueen). So I was right!
Sarah: I remain shocked that I can remember things from that many years ago and yet forget things that happened a few minutes ago. My brain is a weird place.
The gunshot opening scared the hell out of me. And the cat.
Elyse: Cue Elyse jumping because she didn’t remember there was a silent opening and then gunshots.
I forgot Rachel’s sister knits!
Sarah: The opening is a little noir. He’s a sensitive man in tight pants who cooks and reads and eats out of the stainless steel pot, and leaves his knives in the grass.
Elyse: Ah yes the “someone broke in and masturbated on the bed” scene. Many sleepover giggles were had.
Carrie: May we pause for a moment to contemplate Client #1’s ponytail.
RHG: EARLY 90S DUDE PONYTAIL
Carrie: That business with the intercom was great.
Sarah: HE DRIVES AN EL CAMINO. Why my brain didn’t hold on to THAT piece of info I do NOT know. “The front is like a car and the back is like a truck….”
Carrie: People always forget that kids have ears.
Sarah: And hey, adorable young dude. There’s Frank’s reason for working. Why is that little dude alone by the pool?! Children + pool + quiet is NOT OK. Oh, great, nanny reading a magazine. That’s not much better.
Carrie: I like that Frank cares about the chauffeur when everyone else is all “whatever”. I think I ship them.
RHG: “Maybe a tough guy?”
“This is my disguise.”
HA. Look, I do not blame Frank for wanting to tap out of this shit right away. It’s a hot mess.
SECURITY UPGRADE MONTAGE. I like how Frank takes Henry the driver under his wing. I remember thinking the evasive driving lessons were BADASS, and I WAS RIGHT.
Carrie: I miss music videos but my God that “Run to You” video is heinous.
Sarah: I don’t believe entirely that Stoic Frank would be emotionally moved by her music video but what do I know?
I have to ask y’all. Did you have the soundtrack? I’m pretty sure I did. Oh, yeah, I definitely did. I remember all the words to the songs, including “Queen of the Night.” Wow, brain, you do hold on to weird things. Nice job.
Elyse: I may be downloading the soundtrack to this movie tonight.
RHG: Other hilarious memories from the 1993 Oscars: Two songs were nominated, and Whitney performed them as a medley. I remember Billy Crystal introducing them as “‘Run to You’ and “I Have Nothing.”
Carrie: CAPE ALERT!
Elyse: The concert scene is what I remember the most. Whitney in a cape. ROCKING A FUCKING CAPE.
The scene where she drops the cape and is wearing her techno-metal outfit holds up to all my memories.
Carrie: It’s so weird that she’s all, “Someone sent me a nasty letter? What? How could that possibly be?” Even pre-internet people got those letters. In the age of twitter they seem positively tame. That doesn’t mean it’s not awful, just that her naivete is surprising.
RHG: Hold up, you fuckers, you’re telling her not to get hysterical when she just found out that somebody walked into her house. You really think that’s a good idea?
Carrie: There’s so much about this movie I don’t get. Have they never had a similar situation with crowds like in the club? How do they usually handle it? That’s not stalker stuff, that’s standard how to manage a concert stuff, and she’s not new, she’s a megastar. So what the hell?
Sarah: How is it she’s that famous and he can take her to random places without her being recognized? Like, because they’re in a country music bar, no one would spot her? That’s very strange.
Elyse: One of the things that’s interesting about this film is how the ideas of wealth and success and celebrity hold up over time. When you compare Rachel’s house to the houses featured in celebrity magazines today (or hell, Johnny Depp’s private island) it doesn’t seem incredibly opulent. Frank makes about $104,000 annually which isn’t anything to sneeze at, but remember, he gets shot at for a living and is the best in his field.
Is this a reflection of an increasingly celebrity-obsessed culture? Conspicuous consumption? I’m not sure.
Sarah: “Politics and showbiz is the same thing these days, Frank.” This was in 1992. Dude.
Elyse: And then comes the scene that launched Elyse’s love of romantic suspense. Frank carries Rachel in his arms to safety.
Carrie: I’m impervious to him carrying her out of the club but him tucking her in is super sweet.
Elyse: Frank tucking Rachel in is the classic romantic suspense flip of “look how gentle I can be when I want to even though I am a hardened bodyguard/ detective/ mob boss/ were-hedgehog MC gang leader.”
Sarah: Ok. Hotel staff would not be cleaning a star’s suite while she’s still in it, especially while she’s sleeping. There’s no way.
Frank eats apples weirdly. Or is that peach? Either way.
RHG: Tony wants to swing his dick around, fine. But a paring knife isn’t balanced for throwing and… you know what, never mind.
Sarah: OK, Frank’s “Did you seriously pull a knife on me” face is my favorite.
RHG: THAT IS GIBBS’ BASEMENT (and aw, she makes sword swooshing noises when she’s playing with the katana WHICH YES IS ACCURATE)
Elyse: “I don’t want to talk about this again.” Because the romantic suspense hero communicates through knife throwing and boning. Is a fact. It has been written.
RHG: I used to like Kevin Costner a LOT. But Frank, my dude, maybe you could get a real spoon? Just one for your sad lonely life? (Also throwing knives works better for me if I hold it by the tip of the blade, not the hilt, but anyway.)
Sarah: Here’s a thing I learned:
This film was originally proposed in the mid-’70s, starring Diana Ross and Steve McQueen, but was rejected as “too controversial”. The film concept was to be attempted again in the late 1970s, with Ryan O’Neal and Diana Ross cast as the leads. The project fell through after only a few months because of irreconcilable differences between O’Neal and Ross, who had been dating.
Carrie: Sy is an asshole but he has a point when he says that Frank has a job to do but so does Rachel.
Aw, Rachel is adorable. How much time did you spend coming up with that approach, Rachel? Cause it’s super cute.
Sarah: And Whitney asking him on a date is so cute.
Carrie: Also their date is super cute.
Sarah: I’m wondering if I’m going to believe the romance. I like how the mystery is built, and I like the angles of the obsessive fan vs. the predatory insider.
Elyse: We have now reached the point in the romantic suspense plot where the heroine realizes that resisting the hero’s protective instincts is futile.
Also Rachel wants to bone Frank. Which is fair. He did carry her offstage in a shower of sparks.
Carrie: I realize that every romance novel in this genre depends on sleeping with the client but it’s a terrible and unethical idea to sleep with the client.
Elyse: I love how they display Frank’s rage by having him literally walk through steam. THANKS MOVIE!
Sarah: Kevin has man feels. And kicks the shit out of someone. Dude. Seriously not cool.
Wow, did that damage my opinion of Frank. My brain didn’t remember that part.
Elyse: The scene where Frank beats up a guy purely because he’s pissed off doesn’t translate well. I don’t remember how I felt about it as a kid, but as an adult it’s upsetting and it makes me like his character a lot less. It’s also super lazy writing.
Carrie: DUDE beating up random restaurant workers is NOT COOL DUDE.
I strongly urge him to press charges.
The sequel: “For Once, The White Guy Does Jail Time”
Elyse: Soooooooo… Frank’s emotional trauma stems from the fact that he was busy burying his mom when the president was shot? Okay…
Sarah: Scarf scene! Yup, still holds up. He illustrates how delicate her life is, how much danger is right in front of her. Subtle and obvious and pretty good tension. I can see the awkwardness between them but I think there’s pretty good chemistry, too.
Elyse: Another romantic suspense trope: hero displays his virility (check out my sword/boner that’s sharp enough to cut a scarf) which immediately seugues into sexytimes.
RHG: Okay, the transition from her singing to the piano at the afterparty was MASTERFUL. Also this is a hell of an Oscar campaign.
Elyse: Back to the money thing: $1000 a plate to see a super famous singer in a private concert?
Carrie: If performers cancelled show dates because of threats no shows would ever happen. I mean, she’s right to cancel them but also this is a speculative fiction version of stardom.
Sarah: I also like how Rachel doesn’t let him decide everything for her, particularly as pertains to their relationship. I might be building more into this film than is there, but there’s a bunch of tensions I find compelling – that he works for her, that he’s supposed to protect her, she’s setting limits with him, he’s setting boundaries for her that she doesn’t like, he’s getting paid a lot of money and struggles with that… there’s a lot going on.
The part where she has a job to do to, that’s kind of the point. There has to be a balance between her doing her job, and setting boundaries.
Carrie: If things are so awful that she’s cancelling concert dates wouldn’t they bring her dog to the cabin too? Stalkers love hurting dogs. Did they just leave the big dog at the mansion? NO ONE BETTER HURT THE DOGGIE!
Sarah: Hold up, is that Chekhov’s toy boat?
Carrie: For a professional Frank knows jack shit about gun safety.
Sarah: Mr. Frank, put a lifejacket on that child. Between water safety and gun safety you’re pretty terribly trained.
RHG: Why doesn’t Fletch know how to swim? There’s, like, multiple pools.
Sarah: Costner really needs a gun safety course. I know dickall about firearms and I know better than than to point a loaded gun at someone’s face as a gesture.
Carrie: Why are we spending all this time on his angst when it’s her sister that got shot?
RHG: So, the “You pay a flat fee, and the hitman goes until the target is dead” isn’t like, the WORST payment model (after all, most targets are going to go down quickly), but you have to think that in the case of Rachel, where it’s taken several attempts, which all involve at least some overhead, there’s a point where he has to go “this is more work than expected, please pony up more cash or I’m not doing it.” Right? At some point your hourly gets REALLY low. You know, for a hitman.
Elyse: I also hate that the sisters are in opposition rather than supportive of each other. I don’t need more women tearing each other down.
Sarah: “You know you’re white!”
I think that chess conversation might be the only reference to race in the whole movie.
That’s just fascinating and kind of incredible then and now. Like, the whole film’s attitude is, “We aren’t acknowledging this facet of the story. Are you? Why?”
Chekhov’s boat indeed.
Carrie: I like the idea of a community of bodyguards. Like they all meet at a bar once or twice a year and bitch about their jobs and how bad their blood pressure has gotten. Not Portman, though because I’m pretty sure he’s the villain.
Sarah: I have a fair amount of respect for the increasing tension, that the hired killer won’t stop, that it’s not over, and she has to keep going, and so does he. They sort of work out their own balance – kind of. Their relationship is largely unresolved.
I also want to say how much I love this woman in gold with hair like hair has rarely haired since the early 90s.
Carrie: Also I ship Frank and Tony. Frank, Tony, and the chauffeur whose name I keep forgetting. I would watch that movie.
RHG: Oh, Debbie! Hi Debbie.
Carrie: Oh dear, hello Debbie Reynolds, we all miss you. I was not prepared.
Elyse: There are so many shiney bolero jackets at the 1992 Oscars…
Sarah: Robert Wuhl! Hosting the Oscar’s! Making sexist jokes! Oh, Lord.
RHG: Ugh, sexist Oscar Host jokes. Ugh. Who do you think you are, Seth MacFarlane?
Elyse: Robert Wuhl is hosting The Oscars?
RHG: Check the envelope! Make sure it’s the right award! (Too soon?)
Carrie: In conclusion I’m super invested in all of the relationships EXCEPT the romantic one. They needed more date time and less mutually douchey and inconsistent behaviour. They don’t have much chemistry except on their date, and that’s mostly because she makes him laugh. Fletcher and Tony and the chauffeur all had more meaningful relationships with Frank than Rachel did.
Sarah: So I had to stop just after Rachel ran off the stage at the Oscars, and come back to the movie the next morning, which gave me a lot of time to think whether it was working for me. With one glaring, inexcusable exception, this is totally working for me. There’s a mystery. There’s Kevin Costner, who seems to think he’s in a noir movie. There’s Whitney Houston, who seems to be embracing the idea that she’s in a romance. The two of them already have enough conflict through the plot and their respective characters, so the additional “what genre are we in?” conflict really works for me.
The exception: Farmer loses control of himself and beats the shit out of some poor dude (in the credits as “Cuban Husband” played by Joseph Hess) who was having a smoke. The idea that this other man is the disposable outlet for Frank’s manpain and feelings of loss of control really makes me angry. Like, How do we show up upset Frank is since Kevin Costner doesn’t move his face a whole lot? Let’s have him use the considerable deadly force of his training against some dude having a smoke. He’s perfectly in control of himself, aware of how much damage he can do to another person, and then he’s not – because of Rachel – and… surely there were better ways to demonstrate that turmoil.
The major elements are totally working for me. The storytelling decisions in that scene do not. Elyse is totally right – it’s lazy.
Elyse: And once again a woman is expected to be embarrassed for “inconveniencing” others over concerns for her safety.
Sarah: Also, a question: if the assassin of stupid was the one hired by her sister, who jacked off and left a note on the bed? The blonde obsessive guy? That’s kind of a crime, too, right?
OK, a note on the ending from teenage Sarah watching this movie: the scarf and glasses at the end? I thought that was the absolute height of glamourous. Ridiculous levels of chic. I’ll be honest, though, that plane looks kinda crappy.
Can there be a sequel about Fletcher, please?
RHG: One last song before parting forever.
Sarah: Also: seeing Whitney’s face saying goodbye to Frank is making my eyes sting.
And then the Casablanca ending – I was totally sniffing a little except they move their heads around a LOT while kissing. WHAT THE HELL.
Elyse: And on to the bittersweet ending. I think they kept it fairly ambiguous as to whether they wind up together and I’m okay with that. (My husband says they are definitely not together but I disagree. He’s just in IA working, ok?!)
RHG: Ending on the freeze frame is a bit much, movie.
Carrie: I did like how well Whitney conveyed that 90% of her life is performance – not just the onstage parts but dealing with her team, the public, other professionals, etc etc. I know people will say that she’s just playing herself, but she was so good at turning that “Benevolent Star” smile on and off.
Sarah: Does this hold up for me? Yes, for the most part. The demonstration of Frank’s fractured emotions through inexcusable violence is terrible. The ways in which the genres Costner and Houston are playing plus the plot conflicts was a lot of my catnip, even if their acting, particularly Costner, didn’t give me much to work with. Actually, now that I say so, I’m wrong – he’s so blank I can embellish a lot onto his performance.
Also: I want a remake of this movie with Rihanna in the lead. As I said in a text conversation, she’d act with one eyebrow and win an Oscar. Not sure who should play the Costner role, but Rihanna would be brilliant in a remake. I’ve already written a good third of the script. With all my (zero nonexistent) screenwriting experience.
My grade: B+.
RHG: Does this hold up? I don’t…. Think so? I got kinda bored there in the middle. And it’s one of those things that especially now, the amount of work that went into those letters is completely unrelatable. Not when you can just make a Twitter bot.
Elyse: I’d give the movie a B.
RHG: But Whitney is at her best here, and she wasn’t even 30. So what have I been doing with MY life?
Did you watch The Bodyguard along with us? What’d you think? Are you a fan of the scarf & sunglasses pairing?
Three Sweet Nothings
This RITA® Reader Challenge 2017 review was written by VeronicaMcD. This story was nominated for the RITA® in the Erotic Romance category.
Five years ago, we’d been together and on fire, but the flames burned us both. Now she’s back in my life and is all my wildest fantasies in the flesh.
I want her. The desire is too powerful to argue against, but I’m not interested in what we had. This is an arrangement about pleasure and finding out who we are behind closed doors. There won’t be talk of love or any sweet nothings whispered by either of us.
This time, I’ll control the heat between us and make sure neither of our hearts get too close to the flames.
Here is VeronicaMcD's review:
I have to start this review by admitting that erotic romances are not my usual cup of tea, and when I looked at the sign up sheet, I did not expect to pick the category for my review. However, I changed my mind when I saw that there was a Nikki Sloane book nominated, and that it was one from her Blindfold Club series that I didn’t realize had been published. I read the rest of the Blindfold Club books last year after reading a SBTB guest review of a prior book. Three Sweet Nothings is the fifth book in the series.
The main characters are Kyle, an attorney and the brother of a previous book’s heroine, and Ruby, also an attorney, and Kyle’s law school girlfriend with whom he endured a terrible break up after law school because of a giant misunderstanding. Both those statements might be a turnoff for some readers, so it’s important to highlight this from the start: this is a second chance romance, and much of the conflict comes from two lawyers not being able to use their words (the ultimate irony, in my humble opinion).
Kyle and Ruby are an interesting pair, because she has trust issues and he has commitment issues. Kyle was raised by two parents that are shown to be very narcissistic and cold, and he lacks the ability to be emotive, especially when that emotion is love. Because of Ruby and Kyle’s previous relationship, Ruby has trouble trusting anyone. However, rather than talking through their issues like adults with professional background in rhetoric, Kyle draws up a sex contract. Basically, the premise of the book is that Ruby and Kyle agree to bone as much as possible, but not to be in a relationship. Kyle somehow thinks this arrangement will fix all of their trust issues and make it possible for them to have a “real” relationship. Um, okay.
The erotic portion of the romance comes in with the contract, which includes willing lists. I found this book interesting because neither Kyle nor Ruby is very into kink at the start of the novel. A lot of the sex scenes involve Ruby and Kyle trying something new to them, which was both refreshing for an erotic romance and, frankly, pretty cute. I tend to enjoy Nikki Sloane’s writing for two reasons: she writes realistic dialogue and phenomenal sex scenes. I felt that this particular story was enough of a departure from previous books that it didn’t feel formulaic. Unlike prior books in this series, the characters aren’t directly involved in the sex club as employees or clients, which I actually liked.
Despite enjoying the book for the most part, there were some problems. During the last few chapters, there was another major conflict, and I wanted to bang my head against the wall. Ruby and Kyle argue and are in a situation similar to the one that caused their original break up, and they basically behave as though they have learned nothing! They are no more trusting, and no better at just talking about their feelings! I was so frustrated, and I was curious to see how the situation got resolved. The resolution actually happened very quickly, and to me, it was out of nowhere and the mutual groveling was not proportional to how bad the argument was.
Another problem I had was that one of the most enjoyable parts of the novel were the cameos of characters from previous books. I liked Kyle and Ruby, but I think that this speaks to the fact that there wasn’t enough development of them that they were not the most memorable part of their story. Sloane also used quite a bit of this book to set up for the next book in the series. This is fairly typical of the books in this series, but there wasn’t any build up for Kyle and Ruby in previous books, so for me, the book lacked balance between the main couple and the secondary characters.
I think that this book would be an A- or B+ as a stand alone novel; however, in the context of the series, I give it a B-. I just didn’t see the same level of character development and plot just didn’t meet my expectations for a Nikki Sloane title. I would still recommend the book, as it’s a good read, and if this sounds like your style, the other books in the series are also great.
This RITA® Reader Challenge 2017 review was written by Meg. This story was nominated for the RITA® in the Erotic Romance category.
Overtime has never felt so good…
Marin Rush loves studying sex. Doing it? That’s another story. In the research lab, Marin’s lack of practical knowledge didn’t matter, but now that she’s landed a job at The Grove, a high-end, experimental sex therapy institute, she can’t ignore the fact that the person most in need of sexual healing may be her.
Dr. Donovan West, her new hotshot colleague, couldn’t agree more. Donovan knows that Marin’s clients are going to eat her alive unless she gets some hands-on experience. And if she fails at the job, he can say goodbye to a promotion, so he assigns her a list of R-rated tasks to prepare her for the wild clientele of The Grove’s X-wing.
But some of those tasks are built for two, and when he finds Marin searching for a candidate to help her check off her list, Donovan decides there’s only one man for the job—him. As long as they keep their erotic, off-the-clock activities strictly confidential and without strings, no one will get fired—or worse, get attached…
Here is Meg's review:
When I read through the preview of Off the Clock, what struck me initially about the story were the paragraphs of exquisitely written smut being written by one of the characters — then the author of those sentences groaning and pitching the draft of his script away. It was the perfect depiction of every person ever who has tried to write a sex scene.
I’m not sure when I last bought an erotic romance so fast.
The book centers around two sex therapists who once attended school together. During a week of spring break when Marin is 18 and Donovan is a grad student, Marin winds up helping Donovan develop a series of audio fantasies that will be used in sex therapy. It culminates in them coming together for one magical encounter before Marin’s life implodes in a heartbreaking way that you’re not expecting.
Leap to eight years later. As full-time guardian of her teenage brother, Marin is now a sex psychologist specializing in research but with barely any practical experience in dealing with patients or her own sexuality. As Amanda noted in her review, this tends to be a common trope for heroines in this area. But the book sells me on it given what Marin goes through in the years between encounters with Donovan.
She takes a job as a therapist, way outside her comfort zone, at celebrity rehabilitation complex The Grove to afford her brother the chance to attend the school of his dreams. There, she literally runs into Donovan, who has become world-famous as the Orgasm Whisperer for the work that she largely helped him with. The chemistry between them is stronger than ever, and despite them recognizing it is a VERY BAD IDEA ™, they can’t keep their hands off each other.
The book is pleasant subversive in a lot of ways. A lot of the erotic romances I have read tend to lean more on the side of tons of sex scenes with a loose plot weaving the story together. Off the Clock is the opposite. There is a lot of time and care taken into developing Marin and Donovan, and they don’t frequently bump uglies until more than halfway through the book. It treads the line of being a BDSM story, but I wouldn’t say it entirely goes there. Almost every sex scene served a purpose in furthering Marin and Donovan’s relationship or their own personal growth. This serves to make the already hot acts nearly scorching, because of how invested you get in Marin and Donovan as actual people and not characters merely there to insert tab A into slot B repeatedly.
And you’ll never see a bottle of wine the same way ever again.
The natural friction points you would expect between Marin and Donovan aren’t there. Marin doesn’t mind she’s uncredited for being a big inspiration for the work that made Donovan famous. I was fully expecting Donovan to hold Marin’s evasion about her age over her, but he doesn’t. He’s surprised and shocked, but never mean about it. It’s obvious the two respect each other immensely.
I had a tough time with the grade of this book, because as much as I love Marin and Donovan, I hated the cliche way that Donovan’s fuckbuddy, Elle, is written. Even though I know she’s the star of the sequel, along with the utterly adorable and seriously hot Lane, there was nothing in this book that made me want to read her story.
Most of the cast surrounding Donovan and Marin are lovingly fleshed out, especially Marin’s brother, Nathan. Marin’s true allyship of her brother is so lovely to read. The patients at The Grove range from heartbreaking to hilarious, with one of my favorite scenes being Marin literally walking in on some quite naughty action going down … on her desk.
That’s why Elle’s actions are so jarring. While I know she will be fleshed out in her own story, the cartoonish way she is depicted in Off the Clock is jarring compared with the way pretty much every major character (and most minor ones) are shown. It reminds me of Paris Gellar of Gilmore Girls before she became one of the best characters in the series. If Elle goes the Paris route of awful to awesome in her own book, sign me up.
Speaking of Lane, I’m normally not into threesomes, but I would had totally gone for one with Marin, him, and Donovan. Just saying.
The other thing that threw me off is the last sexual act depicted in the book – when Marin and Donovan have anal sex. It’s half personal preference (I am just not into that sort of thing) and half the wrong tonal note. Even though it’s shown that Donovan has taken care to prepare Marin, it seems like they went from zero to 10 very fast in that area and I found myself wincing. A lot. It’s dismissed with a line that Marin used the sex toys available to her to explore in that area. I wish the subject had been introduced earlier in the book during the part where Marin was experimenting with said sex toys prior to being with Donovan. Maybe I wouldn’t had been wincing so much on Marin’s behalf there at the end.
Neither of these ruined my overall enjoyment of the book, and I loved the ending and how it showed the characters continuing to grow even after the hookup. Marin’s personal victories made me nearly stand up and cheer, especially.
If you enjoy your erotic romance with a hefty dose of meaty plot, some angst, and some frankly fantastic characters, then Off the Clock is the book for you. This is my first from Roni Loren, but it won’t be the last.
Off the Clock by Roni Loren received a B+ in a previous review by Amanda.
'It remains a frustration to hear GENERATIONS referred to as an "Elseworld" story. DC put the ELSEWORLD bullet on the covers against my wishes. The whole thing was an IMAGINARY STORY, as declared in the logo. And it was important that it was "imaginary". The whole notion of including so many of the continuity lapses from the old books (Superboy can fly, early Superman can't, etc) simply doesn't work if it's an "Elseworld". And, of course rub salt in the wound they even included a scene from GENERATIONS in the montage that introduced "hypertime". GAH!!!' - John Byrne
( Read more... )
I was actually talking with James about this yesterday, I said I was mad it has Bill and this First Doctor-playing guy who's name I can't remember, and it has Capaldi, and maybe Missy? And this is great because I'd watch them all the time, but a shame because I feel like what's the point of the rengeration episode we just had, which didn't even have a regeneration in it? We could've had a lovely normal story instead of having to have two whole episodes full of doom about the Doctor dying.
It's been a generally pretty doomy season anyway, something I complained about all the way back in "Oxygen." Maybe I'm a big wuss (okay, I am a big wuss) but I do not want bleak right now. I don't want to watch people getting treated worse than they deserve or dealing with circumstances beyond their control. If I wanted that I could read the news or talk to a lot of my friends or indeed think about most of my goddam life.
I'm mad about what happened to Missy and Bill, and I hope though I'm not holding my breath that the Christmas episode will go some way to fixing that.
It's been a stressful week. The worst thing to happen, of course, was Jordin Kare's death on Wednesday. Friday we went down to Seattle both to check on the apartment, and to look for a kitten at Cat City. There were some wonderful ones, but they were all on hold. We went on a wild cat chase up to Lynnwood, only to find that the kitten we'd wanted to meet had been adopted while we were on the road.
The second pod was unloaded yesterday, mostly using hired muscle. It filled an appalling amount of space in the garage (I set up the plastic shelves down the center, and there are piles (mostly of book boxes) next to it. So there's that.) I had a bit of a meltdown this morning upacking mostly kitchen stuff, including the Peter Rabbit plate that I'd had as a kid, and realizing that we didn't have nearly enough room for even the reduced amount of stuff we brought, and concerned about money, and, and, and,... The usual stuff that happens when the brain weasels go out to play with the black dog.
We currently have two boxes of stuff to give away, one for my daughter who has just gotten engaged, and a largeish pile for G.
However, despite the stress, our first full week here has mostly been pretty good. Colleen's new caregiver, G", is working out quite well. (Glenn is G; our previous housekeeper, Giselle, was G'. This one is named Gina, so, ... After her I'm switching to subscripts.) Molly, our Chevy Bolt, is finally getting fully charged every day or two. (I am somewhat amused by the fact that she sends me a text when she's done charging. Molly is not amused by being mistaken for a wallboard anchor.)
Our beds are here, but we're waiting until after the new floor is in (Tuesday) to set them up, since moving them would involve taking them apart and setting them up again -- not worth it.
Our cats are at least not fighting; we're still keeping them separate until we can (hopefully) re-introduce them. We've bought a couple of Feliway pheromone diffusers - one for the main area of the house, and one for the room we plan to use for the re-introduction.
I have also replaced the ionization fire detector nearest the kitchen with a photoelectric one. Ionization detectors are sensitive to open flames, and we have a gas stove. Bad combination.
I haven't heard from either of the people I'm working with for Pod Together. I'd mainly like to know if what I wrote works for them and if there are things I could do to make it work better.
I really ought to be asleep, but I can't seem to relax. The fact that Scott has to stay up to try to shift his sleep schedule isn't helping.
What did upset me was being unable to reach the bandages in the middle of my back the next day in order to take them off 24 hours after the procedure. I finally ended up at urgent care, because I was literally having a panic attack about not being able to reach them.
I had a mammogram and a breast ultrasound on Wednesday, which is resulting in another biopsy on my left breast this week, for the same reason I had the lung biopsy, to rule out whether the cancer has spread.
I should get the results of the lung biopsy tomorrow or Tuesday, and the breast biopsy a few days after it takes place.
So far as I know, surgery's still scheduled for August 8th. But that could change depending on the results of the biopsies.
I feel like swiss cheese. And if I thought I had a prayer of a chance of outrunning this, I'd be in my van right now, headed god knows where.